@vgmlr · 1y 336d
Persistence of this notion (every 5 years) has grown the subatomic theory of every thing to (17) particles and (~4) dimensions (..so far).
>job security
>can not see the forest for the tree
Perceive these points of /moments/ as variable energetic collisions, they would be too numerous to model. #RFT
|
@vgmlr · 1y 336d
>spheres are the most efficient shape in nature
Spheres are not consequence of the material inside but by external influences. Standard Model and Quantum Mechanics physicists make /conditioned/ effort to scrutinize the point rather than the field as catalyst. #RFT
>nothing matters most
|
@vgmlr · 2y 124d
Seeds are a fine example of every thing wrong in modern physics. A simple minimal seed stores the single strand of information capable of replicating and sustaining an otherwise complex plant. Inside the seed is very facile, as is only required for the replication.
>this goes down for water
>this goes up for light
Most every thing else after is a product of environment.
>adaptive evolution
>collaborative breeding
In physics today, the more grant inspired scientists dig deeper, the more complex their singularity becomes -- rather than the notion of consequential replication. So much so that now the commonly accepted model is that metaphorically one seed alienated from another seed, influences the other even prior to propagation (~supersymmetry).
#ResistanceTheory is a model of replication.
|
@vgmlr · 2y 169d
Permit me to use Archimedes to explain why Einstein is wrong.
>Fa=pgV
One of the major discrepancies in modern physics is the dismissal of displacement. The acceptance of 'nothing' permits their form of gravity being a multidimensional well --
>space takes up space
-- matter and the space that it bends must then have room or make room by displacing space (*bends) compounded by the volume of matter (and proposed dark versions) subsequently theoretically making our universe a gruesome globules bulging sphere. There shd thus then be an uneven distribution of the travel of matter thru the universe based on density of heavier elements purported to have a greater gravity well.
>nothing is nothing
-- is how they excuse this whilst claiming nothing is some thing when applicable to gravity and light and energy and et cetera. They alienate space from matter to suit long held confidences --> and they shd be more predisposed to abandoning fixed states of failed models.
>nothing is every thing
#ResistanceTheory proposes that matter is an active state of 'nothing', space is not bent rather a transition and gravity is a velocity.
 |
@vgmlr · 2y 182d
>gravitational waves are affected by gravitational lensing
>gravitational waves are affected by gravitational waves
>dark matter influences gravitational fields
(>_ლ) ..could maybe the vacuum model of space just be wrong?
>can't --> otherwise sm/qm resonance does not work
They do not work by your own admission.
Tesla: Einstein is a hack.
Yet we are unable to convince institutions of this.
Talking Heads: We are certain about xyz theory.. for likes.
And then there is that.
>pic rel
--alienates particles and energy from the field where as #ResistanceTheory states that the (every thing) field is not particles or dualities but spherical wave undulations --> and density of collisions (misidentified as particles) and reverberations relates to the density of matter and light. Gravity is a consequence of the weight of reverberations in a given space.
|
@vgmlr · 2y 211d
#ResistanceTheory
>every thing is the same thing at a difference velocity
Standard-Quantum-Particle-Etc Theory
>every thing is a thing with-in a thing layered as things which segregate as things while then desegregates as things when things become larger things despite sma--wait we're changing this again but feel free to accept that one until our next paper
|
@vgmlr · 2y 244d
There is something fundimentally wrong about the linearity of light at a distance immersed in other transient light. The volume of "data", expressed in a spherical dispersion, is equal, until acted upon by interference --> but consider this is true for all light sources in proximity to the primary observation. Ideally there shd be greater cancelation. Ayh have discussed this before in #RFT where the offset perpendicular reflective of data must be true yet seems unharnessable.
|
@vgmlr · 2y 261d
How they choose to delineate atomic models is that all atoms are waves until observed at which they become particles (static), or points in an otherwise superposition state (unpredictable, everywhere).
>pic rel
Then how is it that these static images are fixed to a particular pattern when the atoms are oscillating at such an incompatible to human observation metric --> unless the human metric is defining the engineered observation. #PlayDohPhysics
As well if the particle becomes trapped in a state but are otherwise non-fixed (waves) then how does matter or the atomic structure hold together when freely inhabiting space? The mental gymnastics of particles absolving particles of expansion is contrarian to all other physics. 'Dark matter' in their theory then acts as an excusable membrane with no sense of permanence value.. a suitable convenience particle.
Ayh proposition that the waves are not the densities but rather the flux between collision states which are the particles and matter, then held together by energetic values and volume in reverberation. The waves are an active/inactive state in a field of everything (dark) and the amount of energy in a given collision is the value of the matter --> not several variant to neutral atoms split into a further dozen of QED values as defined again by PlayDohPhysics. #ResistanceTheory
 |
|
1. TVShow (227) 'CSA'
2. Wedge (Miter) 1.0.0
3. TVShow (228) 'APT'
4. TVProgram (83) 'BXT'
11:51 339 025 |
|
|
